Donald Trump is out of control

American president Donald Trump won't make America great again, but turn it into ruins. America was always great. It was built on greatness. Donald Trump is a business man turned (MAGA) into brand generating profit, and some kind of new political movement.

Everybody knows about the mountain's American debt. Government debt, credit card debt, mortgage debt, bank loans, student loans debt, Corporates debt, municipalities' debt, states debt and so on. The federal government even borrows money from pension and retirement funds. Mountains of debt will make Everest Mountain nothing compared to American debt. The American debt bubble will explode sooner or later, no different with disastrous consequences on the global economy.  

The burst of the American debt bubble means the collapse of the U.S dollar for good. The next coming crisis will be about the American debt and the U.S dollar. Donald Trump with his interesting team is rushing steps for the day of the ultimate disaster. The aim of Donald Trump from all his recent decisions is to weaken the dollar.

The problem of everything Trump is doing will fail because American economy isn't solid. It's based on stock market, debt, suspicions and mysterious financial tools such as the derivates. It isn't a real manufacturing economy anymore. A weak dollar means a strong export sector. U.S has few items to export or maybe two items, weapons and oil. However, many other countries have weapon and oil to export. You can't have weak dollar then low interest rate. Then you are possible facing inflation and found yourself forced to raise interest again.  

I was reading some interesting analysis about Trump's recent decisions on tariffs and not ending the war against Iran. He is spreading mistrust among his allies, and all that is coming with negative consequences. France declares that the last shipment of their gold deposit in the U.S arrived in France. I am sure that sooner than later, other countries will follow France's steps. The dollar was the world reserve currency because of trust. All flat currencies are accepted by people because of trust. Now, trust in the U.S dollar is gone.

Seriously, what is that guy doing? Your comments are welcomed and maybe will help understand what the president is thinking.

End

The Next Global Financial Disaster

The next Global disaster is coming and it's a matter of time before the free fall of the global economy. The Debt bubble will burst or to be more specific, the U.S Dollar bubble. Allan Greenspan as he was the FDR chairman described the current debt fueled economic model in the U.S as unsustainable. It is easier to create an economic bubble than to sustain it. And this is what is going on in the American economy, creating bubbles. Then we have the bubble guys or the bubble experts using the method of hit and run, collecting their profits before the bubble explodes in every other fool's face.

France declared that the last of their gold reserves in the U.S arrived in France. I mean we know the reason why Donald Trump has a red eye from France. He hates them, and keeps talking about how the American army is protecting Europe in exchange for nothing. Even during the recent war on Iran, Europe kept their distance. But we need to note that the gold reserves in countries like France or Britain mostly is an accumulation of the colonial era. It was stolen from the colonies in Egypt, Sudan, South Africa, India, Morocco, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon and others. Now Trump is planning how to steal the thief's gold.

I read a few books for James Rickards, an American author and financial expert who was working with top government agencies. He was talking about how China could bring down the U.S on its knees without firing one bullet using the Derivatives and other financial instruments. China has a financial nuclear bomb, 3 trillion of financial papers and debt bonds. Maybe 50% of it by some estimates is American treasury bonds. China wasn't buying much American treasury bonds recently, but is selling slowly and steadily.

James Rickards should be taken seriously. He was working as a consultant and economic expert for the CIA. They conduct a financial war experiment in The Applied Physics Laboratory, a top secret facility located half way between Baltimore and Washington as he described in his book "Currency Wars." Now maybe he was writing a commercial style book or maybe he knows something or has the green light to describe his work at a top secret facility. In my opinion, he should be taken seriously according to recent events, especially the war on Iran and its consequences.

He was talking about interesting information. The price of gold could approach 10000 U.S.D/Ounce and even 50000 U.S.D/Ounce. He was talking about an American president declaring an emergency, seizing the foreign gold in U.S vaults and paying back with freshly printed, inflated value American dollars. That is a dangerous decision to make. In my opinion, it is possible that Donald Trump will do it. He is the perfect candidate for such a foolish thing. It is like declaring a worldwide financial war or he may have already started such a step through the tariffs. And it is possible that France predicted such a step or they have specific information that they got their gold reserve back from the U.S.

End  

New World Order

Capitalism is a ruthless system of economic, political elites and transnational corporations that control nations and exploit them for their own interests, economic expansion, and control over natural resources. Chaos and civil wars are hallmarks of the new world order, which superseded the old order established on the ruins of nations after World War II and the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. The old world order collapsed economically with the abolition of the Bretton Woods Agreement when US President Richard Nixon announced the abandonment of the gold standard in 1971, and it collapsed politically with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union. The American author of Japanese descent, Francis Fukuyama, declared in his book "The End of History and the Last Man" that this represents the absolute triumph of capitalism and liberalism, and that it is the culmination of human history.

Perhaps Professor Fukuyama was mistaken in his end of history theory, because the conflict continues even within the capitalist camp—a fierce and relentless struggle. There are blocs that appear political on the surface but are fundamentally economic, such as BRICS, the European Union, China, India, and the United States. The Israeli-Iranian-American war is one chapter in this conflict, reflecting the United States' pursuit of absolute control over energy resources and the global economy. The Iranian nuclear issue and Israel are marginal, a mere repetition of the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and Syrian chemical weapons issues. It's a bleak and tiresome scenario, a broken record. The Iranian regime has successfully deceived the United States, setting a trap for it, much like the Soviet Union did in Vietnam, and has drained the United States of its resources. Iran sought this war because it has ambitions in the Arabian Gulf region. It occupies the three Emirati islands, claims Bahrain as its own, and threatens to occupy the territory of the United Arab Emirates.

The fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union were due to a traitorous agent holding the title “head of state”, Mikhail Gorbachev, who received his just reward: from the leader of a superpower to a television advertising star for pizza and other commercial brands. Disaster capitalism always seeks victims, and the fall of the Soviet Union signaled the end of the old world order, the bipolar system, and the emergence of a new world order characterized by a unipolar world, with the United States playing the role of the world's policeman, striving to control all the world's resources, from energy and rare minerals to other riches.

The fall of the regimes of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad are merely chapters in the process of building a new world order. For this to happen, the remnants of the old world order must be eliminated. Others are next, and the American-Israeli war against Iran is another chapter in the narrative of building a new world order. The old regimes that the United States succeeded in toppling belong to a bygone era of history that must be completely erased. The United States is trying to prevent the emergence of a new multipolar world order and, to that end, seeks to control energy resources and maritime shipping routes, including straits and waterways.

The Arab Spring can be seen as one chapter in the American struggle and attempts to remodel the map of the Middle East within the framework of the New World Order. The Arab Spring is a collaborative program disguised by glittering media terms like "creative chaos," suggesting a positive, albeit two-pronged, event. This tactic targets the naive and the gullible, those who never read history and still feel optimistic, but the reality on the ground contradicts this. The United States, with British oversight and French participation, allied itself with Islamists from the remnants of the Soviet-Afghan War era, including the various militant groups, ISIS, and the Muslim Brotherhood, whose proliferation served to conceal the collective Takfiri jihadist organization under its banner. The Arab Spring spread among the countries where it was developing, like a contagious virus infecting humans.

The Arab Spring and the color revolutions have not and will not stop in the Middle East, China, Europe, and Asia. The fall of Syria is the first domino to fall, and there will be more victims in the future. The process of toppling the Syrian regime was extremely cunning and meticulously planned, with several important stages, perhaps the three most significant being: First, the Ukrainian war, which was an American trap into which the Russians, known for their recklessness and impulsiveness, fell. However, they have now retaliated against America by supporting Iran and prolonging the conflict to serve their own goals and interests. Second, striking at its rear in Lebanon by fabricating a banking and financial crisis, as the majority of deposits held by Syrian merchants and wealthy individuals were in US dollars, which were prohibited from being used or even discussed in Syria. Third, the 7th of October operation carried out by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, which brought in Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen with Iranian support under a glittering, false, and deceptive media title of “Unity of the Arenas,” and thus unleashed a political, economic, and military tsunami that deprived the Syrian regime of support it desperately needed, as its allies were scattered in different arenas of conflict managed by the United States and Israel with British and French operational support.

The end of the conflict is unclear, and it is too early to judge the shape of the new world order. Will the regional war in the Middle East escalate into a global war? The truth is that the American writer of Indian origin, Fareed Zakaria, presented a viewpoint in his book "The Post-American World," which gained widespread publicity due to a photo of former US President Barack Obama holding a copy of the book during one of his presidential trips. However, the book has been misrepresented by social media trolls who haven't read it or even bothered to look at the titles. The book doesn't talk about the end of America, but rather about a multipolar world in which the United States remains the strongest, but is forced to share power with other influential actors like China and India because, with its current system, it is incapable of managing a new world order as the sole superpower.

The End

What really happened to Syrian president Bashar Al Assad?

I wrote previously that the fall of Syria would trigger the collapse of the Middle East and the beginning of a series of regional crises and wars, perhaps even a world war, from which no country would be immune. Syria is a pivotal and important country in the region, and its fall would resemble an earthquake, the aftershocks of which would reverberate throughout the region and the world. There is a madman in the United States named Donald Trump, mired in economic problems and scandals, and the solution he sees fit to escape them is war. The United States is a country addicted to war, and its history is replete with instances of emerging from one war or crisis only to plunge into another.

The undeniable truth is that Russia betrayed Bashar al-Assad and his regime, proving itself an unreliable ally. The reality is that all major powers are untrustworthy, readily abandoning their allies at the first real confrontation. All the statements from top officials, from Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump, confirm that the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria was the result of an international agreement involving Russia, Iran, the US, Turkey, and Israel, not a military defeat, even after a brutal 14-year war.

Treachery is the root cause, and traitors played the primary role in the fall of Syria. Military commanders received anonymous orders to withdraw, and soldiers and officers were ordered to abandon their weapons and retreat. The events leading to the regime's collapse in Syria are a replication of what happened in Iraq in 2003. The loyalty of senior officers and commanders was bought, and the result is the same: the fall of the regime and the transformation of the country into a breeding ground for terrorist organizations and terrorists. The United States allied itself with Islamists in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, which is not a new tactic. It previously allied with them in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, and even in Russia, where it allied with Islamists in the Caucasus region in an attempt to weaken the Russian Federation, the successor to the Soviet Union, the superpower that once dominated Eastern Europe.

The absence of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad since the fall of his regime in 2024  raises suspicions about his fate. Did he actually flee to Russia with the help of Russian forces , or was he killed and eliminated, his chapter closed for good? There have been brief media appearances by his son Hafez and anonymous tweets attributed to his wife Asma al-Akhras, who has been the subject of rumors, some of which are credible, that she was working for Britain, a British spy, and that her marriage to Bashar al-Assad was a step to ensure the inheritance of power from father to son with the tacit approval of Western countries. Or perhaps this is what the media has promoted in an attempt to hide the truth, which will come to light with time, perhaps through another leak or declassified documents.

The fate of other leaders was clear: some met their end in the International Criminal Court in The Hague, others were executed by hanging, and still others were kidnapped, as happened in Venezuela. Their true fates remain unknown, awaiting revelations from time and declassified documents. So, what will be the fate of Bashar al-Assad after the fall of his regime in 2024?

End

America-Iran-Israel war is another classical oil war

Oil is an element in all major conflicts since 1914. Iran has been in the center of the storm since 1911 to be more specific. A German battleship, the panther, visited the Agadir harbor in Morocco which was surprising for the British. The reason was that The Panther was working using oil, not coal like British Royal navy ships. What is that supposed to mean? Longer distance, bigger battleship, more guns and stronger in general terms.

Winston Churchill was appointed First Lord of Admiralty. Churchill was facing an inevitable issue technical in nature; convert the Royal Navy to oil as source of power in place of coal. Churchill's concern was for the safe and secure local coal source mainly in Welsh. And Churchill decided to go with oil for the benefits of better speed and efficient use of man power. The British Royal Navy supremacy in sea controlling major shipping routes was the key for being a global empire. Churchill recognizes this and works on getting ready for the future coming war with Germany.

Iran oil became vital to all British future war and economic planning. The Iranian city of Abadan contained the biggest oil refinery in the world by that time. However, Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh on 15/March/1951 cut the long story short for the British when the parliament passed the bill he introduced, and nationalized the Iran Oil industry. Mossadegh now crosses the red line and the British get ready for revenge. But, they weren't able to work on toppling Mossadegh alone, so the Americans needed to participate. And as the usual tradition in the U.S, no free chasse even for their British allies.

British let go a considerable portion of Iran oil for Rockefeller companies in exchange for American participation in operation Ajax 1953. American dollars bought few Iranians, mullahs, and shop owners in Tehran bazar. It starts from there. Americans work on spreading rumors that Prime Minister Mossadegh was communist and a puppet for Tudeh communist party. The Bazar shop owner got paid large sum of money to gather a groups of demagogue, protest and attack houses of Mullahs and mosques, raising Tudeh communist party flags while screaming communist slogans.

The Iranian regime thrown in 1953 was totally secular, and elected by Iranian people. But that doesn't matter for Americans and British. Iran in 1953 had no ultraorthodox Mullah regime, no death by hanging in public places for opposition, no Savak horrible secret police and no girls forced to wear hijab and veil. The Americans and British brought all of that back to Iran. If you don't give us your oil, we will screw you up ugly. Your mother won't recognize you.

The same scenario was duplicated to overthrow Mohammed Reza Pahlavi during 1978-1979. It all starts again with Tehran bazar shop owners and corrupted prepaid Mullahs ready to do whatever for a suitable price. Mohammed Reza Pahlavi had a plan to modernize Iran, and he required more royalty fees from oil companies. Another important piece of information related to the toppling of the Shah regime, Rockefeller bank Chase-Manhattan was the Iranian government bank. If the Shah is gone and new hostile mullahs take over, the bank will find an excuse to confiscate the money as debt obligations on the fallen shah regime.  

Now if we move the time line to current events in Iran and the war with Israel and the U.S. It's all about the oil. Donald Trump didn't hide his true intentions. It's about oil, while the issue of the nuclear program is a side show. I was watching and reading American media such as NY times that the first American-Israeli strikes killed mostly moderate Iranian leaders. The ones that are ready to negotiate and compromise. What message does this send to the new Iranian leaders? Americans and Israelis always target moderates, and this is their policy in Palestine, Iran, Iraq and everywhere. They assassinated the moderates so the more fanatical extremists take over, and the hostilities continue, and the oil price continues to rise, American oil companies will make more profit.

End

I saw you before, but where? Oh, I remember now

There is much ongoing debate surrounding the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany's leader, Adolf Hitler. The debate over the exact number of victims is crucial for Jewish organizations, which refuse to accept anything less than six million. Anyone who questions this figure faces prosecution, as in countries like France. However, this debate over numbers is trivial because the fundamental human truth about the Holocaust is lost. Murder based on ethnic or religious identity is a grave wrong that must be punished, whether it occurs in one or two cases, or even six million.

The double standards applied to the Holocaust are a crucial aspect of the debate surrounding the number of victims: six million, two hundred thousand, or one million? Stalin was responsible for the deaths of over twenty million Soviet citizens. King Leopold II of Belgium killed ten million people in the Belgian colony of the Congo. The Allies used poison gas in World War I, and in World War II, they bombed Japanese cities with atomic bombs, burning Tokyo with carpet bombing and razing Dresden to the ground. Turkey killed hundreds of thousands of Armenians on the sidelines of the First & Second Balkan Wars and World War I. Isn't this genocide, deserving of historical recognition and the right to be called a Holocaust?

France committed genocide in Algeria, killing over 1.5 million Algerians during 132 years of occupation. They even conducted nuclear tests in the Algerian desert on live human subjects. Imagine, they hanged two Algerian prisoners to film a scene for an American movie in Algeria. France's crimes in Tunisia, Morocco, Africa, Syria, and Lebanon are no less horrific, yet they have not been classified as war crimes. No Nuremberg trials were held for the perpetrators, the colonial powers have not apologized or paid reparations, and these crimes have not been recognized as the Holocaust. The use of that word, which has become a trademark exclusively associated with Jews, is forbidden.

During a lecture at the University of Waterloo in Canada, Professor Norman Finkelstein, an American of Argentinian Jewish descent, was interrupted by a woman in the audience who began to cry and accused him of inciting hatred against Jews, being anti-Semitic, and other such nonsense. Professor Finkelstein responded that he had no respect for crocodile tears and that members of his own family, his father and mother, had been victims of Nazi concentration camps and had been members of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Professor Norman Finkelstein is a well-known figure and the author of some of the most famous and widely distributed books on the Palestinian issue and Jewish lies, most notably "The Holocaust Industry."

The girl who cried during Professor Norman Finkelstein's lecture appeared at a meeting where the speaker was American activist Myron Gaines, known for his controversial style and ideas. From Canada to America, the conversation also revolved around the Holocaust. It's clear this student is a professional performer, and her story always ends with either crocodile tears or a retreat. Myron Gaines denies the Holocaust, which is wrong because it's historically documented. However, the disagreement lies in the number and the monopoly on the term to describe the extermination of Jews in Nazi Germany and Europe. He argues that even if Hitler killed only ten Jews simply because they were Jewish, that would still be considered a Holocaust, and the figure of six million is irrelevant to him.

But what is the purpose of insisting on that number? I mean, the Holocaust only became a matter of concern for Western countries after Israel's victory in the 1967 war, which established it as a regional power to be reckoned with, proving its strength and capabilities. The goal is to exploit international sympathy, and inflating the number makes it difficult for Western countries to escape the trap of sympathy, even if it is feigned and insincere. The West wouldn't sympathize with one hundred thousand or half a million victims, but six million is a different matter entirely.

Jewish organizations received enormous compensation from countries like Germany and Switzerland. Swiss banks paid out compensation for the accounts of Jewish Holocaust victims who could no longer be claimed, or for whom there were no heirs to claim them. Jewish organizations either swallowed up these compensations or paid meager sums to heirs who, after deliberate bureaucratic complications, managed to prove their relationship to the alleged victims. Norman Finkelstein wrote about this in "The Holocaust Industry," but he faced fierce attacks that questioned his credibility and the validity of his writing. He also faces sabotage attempts in his lectures, such as those carried out by the "crocodile tears girl" who has become something of a spokesperson for the Jews, as she has repeatedly appeared whenever there is a lecture or gathering in support of Palestinian rights.

End

A short glimpse of Jews history

The Jews used to live a regular life a long time ago, I mean the historical era talked about in the bible. They were farmers in general, and that was the most common way of living. The Babylonians for some reason invaded Palestine and took Jews as prisoners of war. I mean they are like the Assyrians who invaded Palestine later, just expanding their empire.

In the diaspora, it was forbidden for the Jews to work in most professions with exception of money changers and loaning people money. It's what they call banking now. They were good at it. Actually, good isn't enough. They were excellent but greedy. They accumulate a mass fortune as a result. Then a Persian king, after he was successful in toppling the Assyrians empire, allowed the Jews to go back to Palestine and build their temple. This is the story I heard or at least what they want the public to believe.

Jews continue to work in the profession of money. And they continue to be good at it. Meanwhile, people start to hate the Jews more and more because of their greed and of course, because of the biblical story that they killed Jesus. Actually I believe that the second was used as a cover for the first to accuse the Jews and take their money and property. Jews were followed everywhere in Europe by greedy governments and angry mobs. They were expelled and their property taken. Kings used to take loans from Jews merchants and bankers. And when they max the limits, they remember that the Jews killed Jesus.  

The accusation of greed followed them everywhere. William Shakespeare wrote his famous play "The Merchant of Venice." The main character was Shylock, the greedy Jews merchant. Shakespeare wasn't a Muslim. The inquisition courts in Spain weren't applying Muslims Sharia law, but what they believe in the holy book. They hate Jews in Tsarist Russia, they weren't Muslims. I know that Muslims and Jews are enemies. But before Muslims appeared on the map, Jews made enemies with everybody.

End