I saw you before, but where? Oh, I remember now

There is much ongoing debate surrounding the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany's leader, Adolf Hitler. The debate over the exact number of victims is crucial for Jewish organizations, which refuse to accept anything less than six million. Anyone who questions this figure faces prosecution, as in countries like France. However, this debate over numbers is trivial because the fundamental human truth about the Holocaust is lost. Murder based on ethnic or religious identity is a grave wrong that must be punished, whether it occurs in one or two cases, or even six million.

The double standards applied to the Holocaust are a crucial aspect of the debate surrounding the number of victims: six million, two hundred thousand, or one million? Stalin was responsible for the deaths of over twenty million Soviet citizens. King Leopold II of Belgium killed ten million people in the Belgian colony of the Congo. The Allies used poison gas in World War I, and in World War II, they bombed Japanese cities with atomic bombs, burning Tokyo with carpet bombing and razing Dresden to the ground. Turkey killed hundreds of thousands of Armenians on the sidelines of the First & Second Balkan Wars and World War I. Isn't this genocide, deserving of historical recognition and the right to be called a Holocaust?

France committed genocide in Algeria, killing over 1.5 million Algerians during 132 years of occupation. They even conducted nuclear tests in the Algerian desert on live human subjects. Imagine, they hanged two Algerian prisoners to film a scene for an American movie in Algeria. France's crimes in Tunisia, Morocco, Africa, Syria, and Lebanon are no less horrific, yet they have not been classified as war crimes. No Nuremberg trials were held for the perpetrators, the colonial powers have not apologized or paid reparations, and these crimes have not been recognized as the Holocaust. The use of that word, which has become a trademark exclusively associated with Jews, is forbidden.

During a lecture at the University of Waterloo in Canada, Professor Norman Finkelstein, an American of Argentinian Jewish descent, was interrupted by a woman in the audience who began to cry and accused him of inciting hatred against Jews, being anti-Semitic, and other such nonsense. Professor Finkelstein responded that he had no respect for crocodile tears and that members of his own family, his father and mother, had been victims of Nazi concentration camps and had been members of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Professor Norman Finkelstein is a well-known figure and the author of some of the most famous and widely distributed books on the Palestinian issue and Jewish lies, most notably "The Holocaust Industry."

The girl who cried during Professor Norman Finkelstein's lecture appeared at a meeting where the speaker was American activist Myron Gaines, known for his controversial style and ideas. From Canada to America, the conversation also revolved around the Holocaust. It's clear this student is a professional performer, and her story always ends with either crocodile tears or a retreat. Myron Gaines denies the Holocaust, which is wrong because it's historically documented. However, the disagreement lies in the number and the monopoly on the term to describe the extermination of Jews in Nazi Germany and Europe. He argues that even if Hitler killed only ten Jews simply because they were Jewish, that would still be considered a Holocaust, and the figure of six million is irrelevant to him.

But what is the purpose of insisting on that number? I mean, the Holocaust only became a matter of concern for Western countries after Israel's victory in the 1967 war, which established it as a regional power to be reckoned with, proving its strength and capabilities. The goal is to exploit international sympathy, and inflating the number makes it difficult for Western countries to escape the trap of sympathy, even if it is feigned and insincere. The West wouldn't sympathize with one hundred thousand or half a million victims, but six million is a different matter entirely.

Jewish organizations received enormous compensation from countries like Germany and Switzerland. Swiss banks paid out compensation for the accounts of Jewish Holocaust victims who could no longer be claimed, or for whom there were no heirs to claim them. Jewish organizations either swallowed up these compensations or paid meager sums to heirs who, after deliberate bureaucratic complications, managed to prove their relationship to the alleged victims. Norman Finkelstein wrote about this in "The Holocaust Industry," but he faced fierce attacks that questioned his credibility and the validity of his writing. He also faces sabotage attempts in his lectures, such as those carried out by the "crocodile tears girl" who has become something of a spokesperson for the Jews, as she has repeatedly appeared whenever there is a lecture or gathering in support of Palestinian rights.

End

Why I do believe that Adolf Hitler suicide story is ??!!

I don't believe much in the official narratives about Adolf Hitler suicide. I have many reasons why I do believe he didn't kill himself in his bunker in Berlin.

First of all, I won't be surprised that America had a deal with the devil. Hitler isn't the first devil America went to bed with, and won't be the last. Look what is happening with the temporary Syrian president Ahmad Al Share3. The media made everybody believe that he was Al-Qaida; he killed American troops in Iraq and blew schools in Syria with car bombs. There was a big time bounty on his head, I believe 10 million dollars. Now, they left the sanctions of him and he will be welcomed in the White house like a hero. Ronald Regan welcomed the future Al-Qaida terrorists in the White house and called them freedom fighters. Osama Bin Laden was a hero in the American media and was working directly with America National Security Advisor ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI.

Then don't be surprised that Americans strike a deal with Hitler in exchange for his life and safe passage somewhere he could retire. I mean Hitler and top leaders in the Nazi party know too much that interests the American. The hideout places of the treasures they stole from Europe, especially the Louvre Museum in France and documents for weapons that will change the future of wars, and it did. The idea for the American Stealth bomber F-117 came from Germany. It was called Horten Ho 229, and the American army was able to capture one or two undamaged models. The long range canon idea came from Germany. It was called V3. Iraqi president Sadam Hussain was working on the idea with Canadian engineer Gerald Bull that he was assassinated in Belgium 1990. The Jet engine fighters were German, Messerschmitt Me 262. It was amazing with no match in the allied forces that could win against her in the skies. The space program depends on missile technology that was German; Americans know nothing about it. Even some historians believe that Hitler scientists were working on some super next generation technology, planes using antigravity to fly. I once watched a documentary on the BBC that it was the same technology used in Aliens space ships. Hitler scientists were in contact with aliens.

Now, let's get to the point. I don't believe and many other possible share that with me, that someone intend to suicide swallowing a Cyanide capsule will have the focus and concentration to pull a gun and shoot himself in the head. We have two respectful historians that contradicted each other on Hitler 's last moments.

The first narrative written by William L. Shirer. A German historian was an eye witness on many events during Hitler era. His narrative, the official traditional narratives of Hitler last moments written in his book "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."  On April 30th 1945 around 3:30PM, Hitler and Eva Braun retired to their quarter at the bunker. Now quote from the book:" Outside in the passageway, Dr. Goebbels, Bormann and a few others waited. In a few moments a revolver shot was heard. They waited for a second one, but there was only silence. After a decent interval they quietly entered the Fuehrer’s quarters. They found the body of Adolf Hitler sprawled on the sofa dripping blood. He had shot himself in the mouth. At his side lay Eva Braun. Two revolvers had tumbled to the floor, but the bride had not used hers. She had swallowed poison."

The second narrative was written by a British historian Ian Kershaw titled "HITLER", a fully detailed biography about the life and death of the Nazi leader. According to Ian in his book, after Hitler and Eva retired to their room around 3 in the afternoon. The people waiting outside the room were "Goebbels, Bormann, Axmann." Quote again from the book:" Günsche stood on guard outside Hitler’s room." Now it's getting interesting. Quote:" After waiting ten minutes or so, still without a sound from Hitler’s room, Linge took the initiative. He took Bormann with him and cautiously opened the door. In the cramped study, Hitler and Eva Braun sat alongside each other on the small sofa. Eva Braun was slumped to Hitler’s left. A strong whiff of bitter almonds – the distinctive smell of prussic acid – drifted up from her body. Hitler’s head drooped lifelessly. Blood dripped from a bullet-hole in his right temple. His 7.65mm. Walther's pistol lay by his foot."

Now we notice in Ian Kershaw's book that they found Hitler pistol and no mention of Eva Braun revolver compared to William L. Shirer. Another significant point is that after 10 minutes of Hitler and Eva entering their room, the group gathered outside including the guard in the door room didn't hear anything as in Ian Kershaw compared to William L. Shirer. If you fire a revolver, it will make lots of noise. You need to be deaf not to hear it.

End

A Case for Democracy

Nobody can deny the fact that electing Donald Trump as president in the 2016 American election raises a contentious discussion about terms such as Democracy and Populism. Reelecting Donald Trump again in 2024 raises more discussion about the nature of democracy. And do we live in democracies or it's just another form of dictatorship? Communist, Marxist or capitalist, it doesn't matter. It's all about changing the name game.

The discussion is open. We all face ethical questions about democracy. Is an election best expressing democracy and people's free will? Does election mean democracy? Do the 60% winning have the right to marginalize the other 40%? What is the effect of the media on people's opinion? And to what limit the media can be honest? Can money buy democracy?

I mean you know, Adolf Hitler won a democratic election. The result was WW2 and over 50 million civilians killed, Nuclear weapons used over Japanese cities, the Holocaust and the moral acceptance of slaughtering millions of civilians to defeat Nazism. Meanwhile, the media never was honest with the public opinion about a Wall Street helping fund Hitler war machine, Jewish wealthy businessman funding Hitler, and an American intelligence officer helping Hitler write his book “Mein Kampf.”

Hitler and WW2 were examples and many others will follow. What is making American democracy special? Norway, Canada, Sweden, Finland all are democracies. American democracy can be bought with money. Lobbying is a common practice where what is best for the people is decided by the amount of money paid by this lobbying group or that. Political money dominates American democracy and turns it into an ugly phenomena.

Everybody knows how the U.S supports directly or indirectly Islamists all over the world. They throw people into the hands of a few elite ultra-orthodoxy Islamists that they despise in public the idea of democracy. They aided terrorist organizations to overthrow secular governments then asking these terrorists to join the international coalition to fight terrorism. That is bitchy behavior. America will support the son of bitch as long as he is theirs (America) son of bitch. Iranian, Russian or Chinese sons of bitches aren't welcomed at all.

After all of that, does anybody believe that the U.S is a democracy?

End